Bobbie Dohrwardt of Cellcom testified that she prepared the spreadsheet for Avery's cell phone calls (
day 12, page 153)
but the who, what and why of using her "call log" rather than Avery's actual bill wasn't explained. This "call log" created on a spreadsheet (
exhibit 359) was entered into evidence rather than Avery's actual bill, which would have shown all his calls along with the cell sites used. Dorhrwardt's "call log" did not show any cell site information.
During her testimony, Dohrwardt used the "call log" spreadsheet (
exhibit 359), the documents prepared by Kratz (
exhibits 360 and 362), and Teresa's Cingular pre-bill (
exhibit 361) to testify about who called Avery and Teresa and at what time.
It is obvious why Avery's actual bill was not entered into evidence: it would list calls that could destroy the prosecution's timeline. Also, it is important to note that the bill from Teresa's carrier, Cingular, shows phone numbers for her outgoing calls but not her incoming calls. If Cingular only provides the phone numbers for outgoing calls, how did Ken Kratz determine the identity of the incoming callers to Teresa's cell phone (he would need to subpoena or execute a warrant for her call detail request to get the incoming numbers)?
Kratz prepared a separate document, a "summary exhibit," where he listed names of incoming callers to Teresa's cell phone (Exhibit 362 above), but without other official documentation there is no way to confirm that the names are the actual callers. In other words, Kratz's concocted document list names and call times for incoming calls but there is no evidence to back this up. He created these documents to support his timeline. And these documents should not have been presented to Dohrwardt when she testified: she doesn't know who made the incoming calls to Teresa, and for Kratz to ask her to tell the jury who made the calls by reading from his concocted documents is outrageous.
None of the documents used at trial are acceptable. Anything faxed can
be altered. Only printouts of official documentation produced directly by the cell phone carriers should have been admitted into evidence.
"In our records, incoming calls are not shown. No incoming calls show on the records, just the outgoing calls." - Laura Schadrie, Cingular Wireless Store Manager, Day 12, Page 210
"In our records, incoming calls are not shown. No incoming calls show
on the records, just the outgoing calls." - Laura Schadrie, Cingular
Wireless Store Manager, Day 12, Page 210
Kratz created the "summary exhibit" listing Dawn as the 2:27 p.m. caller, but this is based on Wiegert misrepresenting that call since November 3rd. No evidence was entered at trial to prove who made the incoming calls.
On day 12 of the trial, Laura Schadrie, a Cingular
Wireless Store Manager, testified: "In our records, incoming calls are not shown. No incoming calls show
on the records, just the outgoing calls." (
Day 12, Page 210). The incoming calls are pure fabrication by the prosecution.
In all likelihood, the 2:27 p.m. call was from someone in the Zipperer home.
Was this George, JoEllen, Bonnie or Jason returning Teresa's call from 15 minutes earlier? The called lasted 4 minutes and 45 seconds.
Sometime after the 2:27 p.m. call,
Teresa set her phone to "Call Forwarding No Answer," which means her incoming calls would automatically go to voicemail.
About 10 minutes after first trying to call Teresa to see if she could come back for a second shot,
Avery tried again at 2:35 p.m. using *67, but hung up before the call even registered with Teresa's phone: meaning, she didn't see that second call attempt.
At this point maybe Avery decided he should just call AutoTrader and ask them to see if Teresa could come back for a second shot. Avery's actual cell phone bill was not entered into evidence, so we don't know if this was the case.
At
2:41 p.m., an incoming call to Teresa went to
voicemail.
She never retrieved this voicemail. This was the last call to register with a cell tower. This last call forwarded message (CFNA) occurred when her cellphone was still powered on and registered.
When CFNA is activated,
you must provide a forwarding phone number and a number of rings. CFNA
forwards your phone to that forwarding number. If that forwarding number
doesn't answer, then the call is
sent to voicemail. The default behavior is for the phone to go to
voicemail if it is unanswered.
Dawn told Wiegert on November 3rd that the 2:27 p.m. to Teresa could have been her because she left Teresa a voicemail that afternoon. However, Teresa answered the 2:27 p.m. incoming call and spoke to the caller for almost five minutes.
The only voicemails left that afternoon were at 1:52 p.m. and 2:41 p.m. Coincidentally, both of these calls were not included on the summary exhibit created by Kratz of Teresa's cell activity. These voicemails are included in a printout entered into evidence. The printout for the 1:52 voicemail record was altered; the 2:41 voicemail record, although not altered, didn't have any data that would help identify the caller.
Teresa called two other people that morning, and both were located in Green Bay.
It seems virtually every witness called by Kratz at Avery's trial was coached to lie to backup the prosecution's timeline, and it seems like Avery is the the only one with a consistent story about his contact with Teresa that day and the time she arrived and departed.
Teresa's phone last registered with a cell site at
2:41 p.m., an
incoming call that went to
voicemail, and that caller left a 60-second voicemail.
Teresa made no calls and answered no calls after that.
The next person to try calling her was Avery at 4:35 p.m., but by this time
her phone was no longer registering with a cell site, which means it was powered off or the battery was dead or removed.
So something happened to Teresa between 2:41 p.m. and 4:35 p.m.
The earliest she would have left Zipperer's is 3 p.m. Since she hadn't made any calls or received any calls during this time period, there is no cell tower data on her Cingular bill to indicate her location.
Teresa was killed:
1. On Zipperer's property;
2. On the road or at another appointment after leaving Zipperer's property, heading either toward Green Bay or home;
3. At her photo studio in Green Bay if she went there to assemble her materials and overnight her package to AutoTrader; or
4. At or near her home if she headed there after her last appointment (she could have gone home to assemble her materials, with the plan to overnight the package to AutoTrader from Appleton, which is near her home).
Wiegert's report on his November 3rd activity is shady (
trial exhibit 216,
excerpt below). The report doesn't even indicate when he wrote it.
Laura Schadrie of Cingular testified: "In our records, incoming calls
are not shown... no incoming calls show on the records, just the
outgoing calls." And she testified that Cingular doesn't print out the
phone numbers of incoming calls. So Wiegert only had the phone numbers
of the outgoing calls from Teresa's phone. And those calls only had the
phone numbers, not the names of the callers. Wiegert wrote that the
11:43 a.m. outgoing call was to Steven Avery when that number belongs to
Barb Janda. Also, see other notes on the image below on why Wiegert's
report is part of the conspiracy to frame Avery.
